MENÚ
NOSOTROS

The unmitigated risks of Telegram public channels and steps to be followed

Publicado
Claves
  • An investigation by Fundación Maldita.es together with the University of Granada demonstrates how public Telegram channels function as a social network, and how the lack of moderation allows alternative channels to spread harmful content while building active communities.
  • Telegram should review its terms of use to include misinformation, develop moderation measures tailored to the platform, and collaborate with experts and members of civil society.
  • Authorities should designate Telegram as a very large online platform under the Digital Services Act after reviewing its number of users and considering the risks it poses.
  • The complete policy paper can be accessed here.

Comparte
Etiquetas

Fundación Maldita.es has published a policy paper that examines the role of public Telegram channels in the spread of misinformation.

The document is based on the results of research conducted in collaboration with the University of Granada, analyzing over 1.5 million messages sent by 95 public channels in Spanish between late 2019 and August 2024, including both media outlets and "alternative channels".

These are the main findings of the research that shaped our stance:

  • The alternative channels analyzed have a stronger presence on Telegram than traditional media channels.

  • They have a more engaged audience in terms of reactions and comments.

  • They create communities with other channels on similar topics.

  • They also serve as a bridge to the world beyond Telegram: they share a lot of content from other platforms and include links that redirect to them as well.

  • They adapt their messages to current events, providing their followers with a constant "alternative" view of what is happening.

Public channels that work like any other social media platform

Public Telegram channels allow for an unlimited number of subscribers, where the administrator serves as the main and practically sole moderator. Features such as reaction buttons or comments, available in 77% of the alternative channels analyzed, facilitate interaction between the administrator and their subscribers, fostering the creation of very active communities.

Interaction dynamics also exist between the channels themselves through message forwarding, which jump from one channel to another, increasing their visibility. Among the sampled channels, there are both content provider channels and content receiver channels.

Forwarded Messages Between Channels Flow and Volume of Messages

This functionality facilitates the creation of like-minded communities among channels, further enhanced by the "similar channels" recommendations offered by Telegram. For half of the channels, it was possible to access at least one other alternative channel from the sample through this similar channels tab.

Alternative channels gain influence and unmitigated risks

This group of channels continues to expand their reach in terms of views compared to those owned by traditional media outlets that also share content. Despite following different trends, the average reach of each of the most followed alternative channels collectively nears 600,000 views.

Users who turn to these channels in search of content they cannot find in traditional media are exposed to potentially harmful content and disinformation covering many aspects of current events. Many of the most recurring topics are easily associated with the risks that very large online platforms, or VLOPs (of which Telegram is not currently one), are required to address according to the Digital Services Act (DSA).

The risks generated are not confined to this application but extend to platforms with more stringent obligations under the DSA. Through accounts on other online platforms, they target users who might be susceptible or interested in their content, encouraging them to move to Telegram. Meanwhile, through links in their channel messages, they redirect their communities to these platforms. In addition to VLOPs, administrators also redirect users to payment systems such as PayPal or Patreon.

Recommendations for Telegram and the Authorities

Based on these findings, it's important that Telegram is quickly designated as a very large online platform under the DSA following a review of the reported user information. Immediately afterward, it should be ensured that Telegram complies with its new risk mitigation obligations.

For its part, Telegram should implement tailored measures to address the issue of disinformation while respecting the platform's characteristics and freedom of expression. For example, by limiting the number of messages forwards or adding labels such as "forwarded many times."

Additionally, Telegram should include mentions of harmful misinformation in its community guidelines and strive for greater collaboration with representatives of civil society and experts to adopt best practices.

The complete policy paper can be accessed here and more on the results of the investigation here.

Hazte maldito, Hazte maldita
Te necesitamos para combatir los bulos y la mentira: sólo juntos podemos pararla. En Maldita.es queremos darte herramientas para protegerte contra la desinformación, pero sólo con tu apoyo será posible.

Eres muy importante en esta batalla para que no nos la cuelen. Seguro que tienes conocimientos útiles para nuestra batalla contra los bulos. ¿Tienes conocimientos de idiomas? ¿Lo tuyo es la historia? ¿Sabes mucho sobre leyes? ¡Préstanos tu Superpoder y acabemos juntos con los bulos!

También puedes apoyarnos económicamente. Maldita.es una entidad sin ánimo de lucro y que sea sostenible e independiente, libre de publicidad y con profesionales bien remunerados dedicados a luchar, contigo, contra la desinformación depende de tu ayuda. Cada aportación cuenta, cualquier cantidad es importante.