More than half of the misinformation most relevant to Latino Communities during the US elections did not prompt any action from the main digital platforms

Publicado el
Share:
En corto:
  • Fundación Maldita.es, Factchequeado and Tech Policy Press have analyzed the platforms' response to more than 500 posts and videos that contained disinformation already debunked in Spanish by independent fact-checkers in the US
  • YouTube took no visible action on 81% of the misinformative content, X on 75%, and TikTok on 68%.
  • The platform that showed the most capacity was Facebook, just two months before announcing the end of its third-party fact-checking program in the US

The Maldita.es Foundation and Factchequeado, with support from Tech Policy Press, have published an investigation to measure the response rates by Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, X and YouTube to misinformation about the US presidential election of November 5, 2024. 

We have analyzed a sample of 510 publications in Spanish and English related to the elections and of particular relevance to Latino communities. All of them had already been publicly debunked by 9 US-based fact-checking organizations that are verified signatories of the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) and that work in Spanish.

The main results are the following:

  • In total, 55% of posts containing misinformation received no visible action from platforms, with significant differences among the different platforms.

  • YouTube and X are the platforms that fared worst against misinformation: 81% of the misinformative content received no action on YouTube and 75% on X.

  • TikTok shows a somewhat lower percentage of inaction (68%), but It is the platform that most frequently used content removal (78% of its actions), a practice discouraged by fact-checking experts.

  • The percentage of actions on misinformative content on Meta platforms shows significant differences with a similar study carried out during the European Parliament elections. In Europe only 11% of debunked content on Facebook received no visible action, compared to 25% in the US. On Instagram, the figure was 29%, compared to 40% in the American elections.

  • Of the 20 most viral posts that did not receive any action from the platforms, 19 of them were on X and accumulated more than 6.5 million views each.

  • Misinformation content in Spanish and English received a similar percentage of response. The greatest differences appear on Facebook, where disinformation content in Spanish received a greater response (79.7% vs. 45.8%), and on X, with greater action visible in publications in English (28.3% vs. 15.2%).

  • Misinformation about candidates was the most prominent among posts strictly related to “Elections”, the most analyzed topic, while “Migration” was the second most popular topic, representing almost 20% of the misinformation in the sample.

You can access the full report in English here.