Nosotros
Public Policy

More than half of the misinformation most relevant to Latino Communities during the US elections did not prompt any action from the main digital platforms

Publicado el
Tiempo de lectura: 3 minutos
Las claves
  • Fundación Maldita.es, Factchequeado and Tech Policy Press have analyzed the platforms' response to more than 500 posts and videos that contained disinformation already debunked in Spanish by independent fact-checkers in the US
  • YouTube took no visible action on 81% of the misinformative content, X on 75%, and TikTok on 68%.
  • The platform that showed the most capacity was Facebook, just two months before announcing the end of its third-party fact-checking program in the US

The Maldita.es Foundation and Factchequeado, with support from Tech Policy Press, have published an investigation to measure the response rates by Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, X and YouTube to misinformation about the US presidential election of November 5, 2024. 

We have analyzed a sample of 510 publications in Spanish and English related to the elections and of particular relevance to Latino communities. All of them had already been publicly debunked by 9 US-based fact-checking organizations that are verified signatories of the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) and that work in Spanish.

The main results are the following:

  • In total, 55% of posts containing misinformation received no visible action from platforms, with significant differences among the different platforms.

  • YouTube and X are the platforms that fared worst against misinformation: 81% of the misinformative content received no action on YouTube and 75% on X.

  • TikTok shows a somewhat lower percentage of inaction (68%), but It is the platform that most frequently used content removal (78% of its actions), a practice discouraged by fact-checking experts.

  • The percentage of actions on misinformative content on Meta platforms shows significant differences with a similar study carried out during the European Parliament elections. In Europe only 11% of debunked content on Facebook received no visible action, compared to 25% in the US. On Instagram, the figure was 29%, compared to 40% in the American elections.

  • Of the 20 most viral posts that did not receive any action from the platforms, 19 of them were on X and accumulated more than 6.5 million views each.

  • Misinformation content in Spanish and English received a similar percentage of response. The greatest differences appear on Facebook, where disinformation content in Spanish received a greater response (79.7% vs. 45.8%), and on X, with greater action visible in publications in English (28.3% vs. 15.2%).

  • Misinformation about candidates was the most prominent among posts strictly related to “Elections”, the most analyzed topic, while “Migration” was the second most popular topic, representing almost 20% of the misinformation in the sample.

You can access the full report in English here.